"Global Climate Disruption"

"Climate Instability" replaced "Climate Change" which replaced "Global Warming" (which was originally Global Cooling), has not itself been replaced by "Global Climate Disruption". If you think this name change comes on the heals of some new information you would be wrong. Same are arguments, same evidence, same problems/holes; now just with a different moniker. Re-branding a discredited argument or ideology is not the way to win an argument. Whether Global Cooling Global Warming Climate Change Climate Instability Global Climate Disruption is true or not has nothing to do with what it is called.

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/16/re-branding-a-failing-sham-global-warming-now-global-climate-disruption

"The Obama Administration’s free-range uber-leftist psychopath “Science Czar” John Holdren, the same guy who wants to de-develop America (but in a “free market” kinda way) has obviously been charged with re-branding the foundering “global warming” movement:

The White House wants the public to start using the term “global climate disruption” in place of “global warming” — fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.

White House science adviser John Holdren urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo, echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a “dangerous misnomer” for a problem far more complicated than a rise in temperature.

An administration that goes out of its way to make terrorism sound less dangerous than it really is (i.e. “man-caused disaster”) makes the push to sell “global warming” as more dangerous than it really is. Sounds like somebody’s starting to feel uncomfortable because the icecaps and Greenland ice sheets aren’t melting fast enough. Switching “warming” to “disruption” is like Chicken Little — finally realizing that everybody’s catching on — suddenly crying “the ground is rising!”

...
Here’s a slide from Holdren’s powerpoint presentation in Oslo:

Now if we can only convince them that Powerpoint presentations cause global climate disruption.

If you ask me, the science it settled: These people are nuts — I mean, “sanity disruptions.”

"